Putter TalkSign in
Scotty Cameron Studio Design 1
Scotty Cameron

Studio Design 1

Putter Talk's cited, Community-built account of this putter. Facts are sourced, photos are contributed, opinions are the Community's.

Maker
Scotty Cameron
Releases
1
Year
2001
This is the Studio Design 1, not the Studio Design or the Studio Design 1.5. They are different models in our records, not two years of one, and each keeps its own page. See the Studio Design →See the Studio Design 1.5 →

The Record

Written from the sources it cites · machine-drafted for the Community to correct

The Studio Design line, as our record holds it, runs to a single release: the Studio Design 1 of 2001, a classic blade built with a shiny gun blue finish. The maker's page describes its heritage in direct terms, calling it a classic form with a heritage that dates back to Scotty's garage, where each putter was individually made by him, by hand. Whatever came before or after this line elsewhere in the catalog, this is the one entry we hold on it, and it stands as a single, defined moment rather than an evolving arc.

The design details verified on record show a putter built around specific intentions. Its high toe maintains a consistent lie angle for proper alignment, and its negative bounce is built so, per the maker's page, the putter never sits closed. Scotty Cameron's own materials describe the balance simply as perfect balance. These aren't stray specs pulled from a chart; they're the maker's stated reasoning for the shape, repeated across the record in more than one phrasing.

Reviewers who spent time with the Studio Design 1 came at it from the feel side of the game. One review, cited from golfreview.com, called it an outstanding putter, adding that if you are a feel person and want to learn to put a better stroke on the ball, then this is a choice you must consider. risingsunclubs.com.au struck a similar note, framing it as suited to golfers who appreciate blade-style putters with traditional weighting and classic aesthetics. Community opinion elsewhere on the intimacy and feedback of the blade lines up with both of these, though the same discussion flagged that the finish demands upkeep and that clean examples aren't easy to come by, a practical wrinkle that sits alongside the praise rather than undercutting it.

Because this line holds only the one release, there's no second or third generation to trace, no redesign to weigh against the original. What the record shows is a single blade, built on stated engineering choices around alignment and bounce, and received by reviewers as a feel putter for players willing to work at their stroke, with the caveat that a gun blue finish in top condition is the harder thing to find.

Photos · from the Community

Releases

Releases of this line from the Putter Talk record. Similarly named models are separate putters with their own pages.

What the Community says

Warmly regardedCommunity opinion from 2 gathered reviews · not a verified fact
What people praise
intimacy and feedback of a blade engineering refinement that addresses common putting mistakes outstanding putter good for feel and learning stroke
What people flag
tough to find in perfect condition due to the finish, maintenance is required
The Studio Design 1 suits golfers who appreciate blade-style putters with traditional weighting and classic aesthetics.
via risingsunclubs.com.au · cited take
An outstanding putter. If you are a feel person and want to learn to put a better stroke on the ball, then this is a choice you must consider.
via golfreview.com · cited take

Tagged by members

No posts wear this tag yet. Post the first.